🪄 Review your application through the lens of the prompt, not a generic score.

All University AI Policies

Colorado State UniversityAI Policy for Admissions

General Policy:AI use restricted or prohibitedNo disclosure language foundNo review process stated
  • PermissionCan you use AI?
    AI use restricted or prohibited
  • DisclosureMust you disclose AI use?
    No disclosure language found
  • ComplianceHow is it verified?
    No review process stated

Quick Answer: Can you use AI at Colorado State University?

Colorado State University prohibits AI use in undergraduate admissions essays.

  • Disclosure: No disclosure of AI use is required by Colorado State University.

  • Compliance: No compliance review process has been stated by the university.

01 Policy evidence

Not Allowed

  • Using AI to help write the admissions essay
  • Borrowing words from other sources (plagiarism)
02 Sources verified

03 Policy summary
  • Colorado State University's admissions blog post 'How to conquer your admissions essay' provides guidance for undergraduate applicants. Under tip #4, 'Stick to your own words,' the university explicitly states: 'You may be tempted to have AI help write your essay, or borrow words from other places. Don't. We want to hear what YOU have to say.' The post also warns that plagiarism is grounds for rejection. While the guidance is direct, it does not specify any disclosure requirements or enforcement mechanisms beyond the plagiarism warning. The post also suggests using Grammarly for proofreading, indicating that basic editing assistance is acceptable.

04 Additional context

This research row is based on a single blog post from Colorado State University's admissions website, dated November 17, 2016. The post provides explicit guidance for undergraduate admissions essays, directly addressing AI use. The university states applicants should not have AI help write their essay and should stick to their own words. The post also warns that plagiarism is grounds for rejection. No disclosure requirements or formal enforcement mechanisms are stated. The guidance appears to target undergraduate applicants specifically, as the post discusses the 'personal statement' portion of the application. The post also suggests using Grammarly for proofreading, which implies that basic editing assistance is acceptable. The policy is clear in its prohibition of AI authorship but does not address disclosure or verification processes. The source is an official admissions blog, lending credibility to the guidance, though it may not represent a formal university-wide policy.

05 Schools with similar policies

Give the draft one more informed pass

Review the draft against its prompt, surface weak spots, and decide what to revise before submission.

Review your first draft