We have introduced a new AI modal to boost your academic performance

All University AI Policies

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)AI Policy for Admissions

General Policy:Line-level editing allowedMust attest no AI usedManual review possible
  • PermissionCan you use AI?
    Line-level editing allowed
  • DisclosureMust you disclose AI use?
    Must attest no AI used
  • ComplianceHow is it verified?
    Manual review possible
01 What this means for your application

Generally safe

  • Use AI tools to catch spelling errors, fix grammar, and polish sentence mechanics before submitting.
  • Ask AI to flag sentences that are confusing or hard to follow so you can rewrite them yourself in your own voice.
  • If English is not your first language, AI translation or vocabulary suggestions can help you express your ideas more clearly — as long as the underlying ideas are yours.
  • Use AI to help you sketch a rough outline or logical structure for your essay before you start drafting.

Things to Avoid

  • Do not present AI-polished or AI-generated text as entirely your own original writing when it has materially replaced your voice.
  • Never let AI invent, embellish, or reframe details about your background, research interests, or aspirations.
  • Do not ask AI to draft any portion of your essay, even a single paragraph — the full written content must originate with you.
02 Policy evidence
03 Program-specific policies & specific guidelines

  • UCLA School of Law (J.D.)

    P4 • AI use prohibitedD3 • Must attest no AI usedC0 • No compliance stated

    “The use of any artificial intelligence tools to assist in the completion of this application is prohibited.”

    View Source

    Applies to: entire application

Allowed Uses

  • grammar and spell check
  • readability assistance
  • suggesting clearer word choices or translations
  • organizing ideas into an outline
  • advice on content and editing

Not Allowed

  • having AI write all or part of essay
  • submitting generic or fabricated content
  • misrepresenting experiences, goals, or research
  • AI-generated content passed off as own work
04 Sources verified

Confidence: HighLast verified: 2026-03-03
05 Policy summary

  • UCLA Anderson School of Management (MBA) has no centralized AI stance on file, so prospective business applicants should contact Anderson admissions directly and treat AI use conservatively until official guidance is published.

  • UCLA operates a two-tier AI policy: undergraduate applicants are governed by the UC system-wide Statement of Integrity, which explicitly permits AI for readability assistance but requires all content and final text to be the applicant's own.

  • UCLA Graduate Admissions has a dedicated 'Using AI Responsibly in Your Essays' section that allows grammar checks, word choice help, translations, and outlining, but treats AI-written content as a form of academic dishonesty that can lead to disqualification.

  • UCLA Law (J.D.) is the strictest program on campus — all AI tool use is fully prohibited across the entire application, placing it in a different category from every other UCLA program.

  • Medical school applicants apply through AMCAS, which permits AI for brainstorming, proofreading, and editing under a signed certification that the final submission is the applicant's own work.

06 Additional context

UCLA's AI admissions policy operates at two levels. For undergraduates, all UC applicants sign a system-wide Statement of Integrity that explicitly permits generative AI for readability assistance but requires content and final text to be the applicant's own. UCLA Graduate Admissions has its own 'Using AI Responsibly in Your Essays' section allowing grammar/spelling checks, word choice suggestions, translations, and outlining, but prohibiting AI-written content. UCLA Law (J.D.) fully prohibits all AI tool use on the entire application. The overall classification is (P2) because AI may assist with editing, readability, and paraphrasing, but the applicant must write the substantive content. Disclosure is (D3) because the UC Statement of Integrity and graduate admissions policy are explicit attestations referencing AI with consequences (disqualification or removal from consideration). Compliance is (C1) as admissions readers review for voice consistency and authenticity, but no AI detection tools or formal verification processes are publicly described.

07 Schools with similar policies

University of Virginia

Line-level editing allowedMust attest no AI usedManual review possible

California Institute of Technology (Caltech)

Line-level editing allowedMust attest no AI usedManual review possible

Ready to submit your essay with confidence?

Join thousands of academy professionals who check their essays before it counts.

Upload your first essay