We have introduced a new AI modal to boost your academic performance

All University AI Policies

University of DaytonAI Policy for Admissions

General Policy:No explicit policyNo disclosure requiredNo compliance stated
  • PermissionCan you use AI?
    No explicit policy
  • DisclosureMust you disclose AI use?
    No disclosure required
  • ComplianceHow is it verified?
    No compliance stated
01 What this means for your application

Generally safe

  • Ask a trusted person — a teacher, counselor, or family member — to review and give feedback on your draft.
  • Use AI tools for general research or brainstorming topic ideas before you begin writing your admissions essay.

Things to Avoid

  • Avoid relying on AI-generated phrasing or sentence structures, even if you plan to edit them afterward.
  • Do not assume that because no undergraduate or graduate AI policy is posted, AI use is implicitly permitted — the absence of guidance means you should default to full authorship.
02 Policy evidence
  • No AI-specific admissions essay policy found on undergraduate or graduate admissions pages

    Application and Admission Process
03 Program-specific policies & specific guidelines
  • School of Law (JD)

    P3 • Brainstorming onlyD0 • No disclosure requiredC0 • No compliance stated

    uniquely your own with no assistance in its creation from external sources (including AI) beyond basic proofreading or general critiquing

    View Source

    Applies to: personal statement, optional statement

04 Sources verified
05 Policy summary
  • The School of Business Administration has no centralized AI stance on record; applicants should treat business program essays as requiring full independent authorship.

  • University of Dayton has no explicit AI policy governing undergraduate or graduate admissions essays, earning an overall classification of (P0) (no policy on file).

  • The JD program at the School of Law is a notable exception: its application page directly prohibits AI assistance in creating the personal statement, permitting only basic proofreading or general critique — mapping to a stricter (P3)-level standard.

06 Additional context

University of Dayton has no explicit AI policy for undergraduate or graduate admissions essays. The School of Law JD program is the sole exception: its application page explicitly states personal statements must be 'uniquely your own with no assistance in its creation from external sources (including AI) beyond basic proofreading or general critiquing.' This Law School policy maps to (P3) (basic proofreading and general critiquing allowed, but AI cannot assist in creating the statement). The former academic integrity page at /ltc/resources/integrity.php now redirects to an error page. UD does not recommend AI detection software per its online learning blog. Overall university classification remains (P0) due to absence of admissions-specific AI guidance outside the Law School.

07 Schools with similar policies

Ready to submit your essay with confidence?

Join thousands of academy professionals who check their essays before it counts.

Upload your first essay