🪄 Review your application through the lens of the prompt, not a generic score.

All University AI Policies

University of PennsylvaniaAI Policy for Admissions

General Policy:No published guidance foundNo disclosure language foundNo review process stated
  • PermissionCan you use AI?
    No published guidance found
  • DisclosureMust you disclose AI use?
    No disclosure language found
  • ComplianceHow is it verified?
    No review process stated
01 What this means for your application

Generally safe

  • Proofread and refine your drafts manually; light grammar checking with standard tools is generally considered acceptable practice.
  • Write all application essays yourself from start to finish — Penn's authenticity attestation expects your voice, your ideas, and your own editing process.

Things to Avoid

  • Do not submit any essay where AI drafted, structured, or substantially shaped the content — Penn's general integrity standards make this risky even without a named AI policy.
  • Avoid using generative AI to rewrite or paraphrase your responses, since this can strip out your authentic voice in ways reviewers may notice.
02 Policy evidence
  • No AI-specific admissions essay policy found on Penn undergraduate admissions website.

    Application Requirements | Penn Admissions
  • The work you have written and presented as your own reflects your ideas, your writing, and your own editing.

    Application Requirements | Penn Admissions
  • If someone who knows you came across your writing without your name on it, would they know you wrote it?

    Writing | Penn Admissions
03 Program-specific policies & specific guidelines
  • Wharton Global Youth Program

    P3 • Limited ideation onlyD2 • Disclosure explicitly requiredC2 • Automated screening mentioned

    You may use generative AI tools to brainstorm and explore ideas.

    View Source

    Applies to: application essays

  • Penn Carey Law (Graduate Admissions)

    P0 • No published guidance foundD0 • No disclosure language foundC0 • No review process stated

    We expect you to submit a professional and easy-to-read personal statement authored exclusively by you.

    View Source

    Applies to: personal statement

04 Sources verified
05 Policy summary
  • Medical applicants applying through AMCAS are covered by that platform's stance permitting AI for brainstorming and proofreading, but the final submission must be the applicant's own work under a signed certification.

  • Penn's undergraduate admissions site has no AI-specific policy — only a general authenticity attestation stating that submitted work must reflect the applicant's own ideas, writing, and editing, with no mention of generative AI tools.

  • Penn Carey Law Graduate Admissions requires personal statements to be exclusively authored by the applicant, which effectively restricts AI drafting even though AI is never named explicitly.

  • Law applicants applying through LSAC CAS are subject to that platform's baseline AI guidance, with the possibility that Penn Carey Law layers additional restrictions on top.

06 Additional context

Penn's undergraduate admissions website does not contain any AI-specific policy for application essays. The application requirements page includes a general authenticity attestation requiring that work reflects the applicant's own ideas, writing, and editing, but does not mention AI or generative tools by name. Penn's university-wide ISC AI guidance (isc.upenn.edu) addresses AI generally and states that AI should not substantially complete tasks like essay writing, but this is institutional IT guidance not authored by admissions. The Wharton Global Youth Program has an explicit AI policy for its pre-baccalaureate applications (brainstorming OK, AI detection used). Penn Carey Law Graduate Admissions requires personal statements be 'authored exclusively by you' but does not specifically name AI. Wharton MBA and Penn Engineering graduate admissions pages have no AI-specific policy. Downgraded from (P1) to (P0) because no admissions-authored AI-specific policy exists; general integrity attestations without AI mention do not qualify per rubric.

07 Schools with similar policies

Give the draft one more informed pass

Review the draft against its prompt, surface weak spots, and decide what to revise before submission.

Review your first draft