We have introduced a new AI modal to boost your academic performance

All University AI Policies

University of RochesterAI Policy for Admissions

General Policy:Line-level editing allowedNo disclosure requiredManual review possible
  • PermissionCan you use AI?
    Line-level editing allowed
  • DisclosureMust you disclose AI use?
    No disclosure required
  • ComplianceHow is it verified?
    Manual review possible

Quick Answer: Can you use AI at University of Rochester?

University of Rochester permits AI as a supportive tool for brainstorming, editing, and polishing your writing, but discourages using AI to draft or compose your essays and short answer responses. The expectation is that your submitted work reflects your own authentic voice and ideas.

  • Disclosure: University of Rochester does not require applicants to disclose their use of AI tools in the application process. No attestation or declaration specific to AI use is currently mandated for undergraduate applicants.

  • Compliance: University of Rochester admissions staff may manually review applications, and the office has signaled awareness that AI-generated writing can suppress authentic student voice — a quality reviewers actively seek. While there is no automated detection requirement on file, human reviewers are positioned to notice writing that feels impersonal or generic.

01 What this means for your application

Generally safe

  • Use AI tools to brainstorm and explore potential essay topics or themes before you start writing.
  • Run your completed draft through an AI tool to catch grammar, clarity, or structural issues — as you would a spell-checker.
  • Use AI to help you think through how to organize your ideas, then write the actual content yourself.

Things to Avoid

  • Avoid over-relying on AI editing to the point where the final essay no longer sounds like you — light refinement is fine, but heavy AI rewriting crosses the line.
  • Do not submit writing where the voice and perspective feel detached from your own; reviewers are trained to notice when authentic character is absent.
  • Do not use AI to generate the full text of your personal statement or any essay from scratch — this is explicitly discouraged by the admissions office.
02 Policy evidence

  • “the University of Rochester discourages the use of AI to compose application essays or short answer responses”

    How to Apply - Undergraduate Admissions

  • “The effect often stifles an applicant's authentic voice – a key element of what we hope to hear within their personal statement”

    First-Year Students - Undergraduate Admissions

  • “artificial intelligence tools may be helpful in generating essay topic ideas, and in editing or refining students' writing”

    How to Apply - Undergraduate Admissions

Allowed Uses

  • generating essay topic ideas
  • editing existing writing
  • refining students' writing

Not Allowed

  • composing application essays
  • writing short answer responses
03 Sources verified

Confidence: HighLast verified: 2026-03-07
04 Policy summary

  • University of Rochester's undergraduate admissions policy explicitly discourages AI composition of essays and short answers, using the word 'discourages' rather than 'prohibits' — placing it in a moderate restriction tier where substantive AI assistance is allowed but composition is not.

  • The admissions office has publicly connected AI overuse to a loss of authentic voice, signaling that human reviewers are attuned to AI-generated tone — a soft but real compliance signal.

  • AI is welcomed for idea generation, editing, and refinement, giving applicants meaningful flexibility to use tools like ChatGPT as writing aids without violating policy.

05 Additional context

University of Rochester has a clear undergraduate admissions AI policy that discourages AI composition of essays while explicitly allowing AI for brainstorming, editing, and refining. The language uses 'discourages' rather than 'prohibits,' placing it at (P2) (substantive assistance allowed) rather than (P3) or (P4). Emphasis on preserving authentic student voice implies soft review signals (C1). No AI disclosure requirement found (D0). No graduate admissions AI policy found on graduate studies pages. Policy appears on 2025-26 application cycle pages.

06 Schools with similar policies

Fordham University

Line-level editing allowedNo disclosure requiredManual review possible

Washington University in St. Louis

Line-level editing allowedNo disclosure requiredManual review possible

Stony Brook University

Line-level editing allowedNo disclosure requiredManual review possible

Ready to submit your essay with confidence?

Join thousands of academy professionals who check their essays before it counts.

Upload your first essay