We have introduced a new AI modal to boost your academic performance

All University AI Policies

University of TennesseeAI Policy for Admissions

General Policy:No explicit policyNo disclosure requiredNo compliance stated
  • PermissionCan you use AI?
    No explicit policy
  • DisclosureMust you disclose AI use?
    No disclosure required
  • ComplianceHow is it verified?
    No compliance stated

Quick Answer: Can you use AI at University of Tennessee?

University of Tennessee has no explicit AI-specific policy governing admissions materials; the university's system-wide AI policy (BT0035) is scoped solely to academic coursework and does not extend to application essays or personal statements.

  • Disclosure: University of Tennessee does not require applicants to disclose AI use in admissions materials, as no disclosure requirement exists for the application process.

  • Compliance: University of Tennessee has no stated compliance mechanism for AI use in admissions essays; however, the Winston College of Law notes that personal statements must be composed by the applicant, implying an expectation of authentic authorship.

01 What this means for your application

Generally safe

  • Write all essays and personal statements in your own voice, using AI at most as a brainstorming tool to generate initial ideas rather than final text.
  • If applying to the Winston College of Law, treat your personal statement as a strictly self-authored document given the school's language requiring applicants to compose it themselves.

Things to Avoid

  • Avoid having AI generate, rewrite, or substantially draft any portion of your personal statement or application essay, even if no explicit ban is stated.
  • Avoid submitting AI-generated content to the MSSW program, where the personal statement is evaluated for your individual critical thinking and writing ability.
  • Do not assume that the absence of an explicit AI policy means AI use is freely permitted — the lack of guidance creates risk rather than permission.
02 Policy evidence
03 Sources verified
04 Policy summary
  • Law applicants are also subject to LSAC CAS platform terms, which set a baseline AI guidance layer that individual law schools, including UT Law, may supplement with additional restrictions.

  • The MSSW program at the College of Social Work evaluates personal statements specifically for individual critical thinking and writing style, making AI-generated content particularly risky in that context.

  • With PDC codes (P0/D0/C0) across the board, applicants should interpret the policy vacuum as a reason for caution, not permission, and err toward fully self-authored submissions.

05 Additional context

No AI-specific admissions policy found. The UT system-wide AI policy (BT0035, effective Feb 2025) is explicitly scoped to 'instructional and assignment purposes' in 'academic courses' and does not cover admissions materials. The Writing Center provides AI guidance for coursework but not admissions essays. The undergraduate application includes one required essay (seven prompts) and an optional supporting statement, with no AI restrictions mentioned. The Winston College of Law states personal statements must be 'composed by you' but does not explicitly reference AI. Previous classification included D2/(C1) based on the system-wide academic policy, but that policy does not apply to admissions per its own scope language.

06 Schools with similar policies

Ready to submit your essay with confidence?

Join thousands of academy professionals who check their essays before it counts.

Upload your first essay